Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of elobixibat plus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate and split-dose 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation before outpatient colonoscopy: a study protocol for the multicentre, randomised, controlled E-PLUS trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium picosulfate (SP)/magnesium citrate (MC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid are recommended by Western guidelines as laxative solutions for bowel preparation. Clinically, SP/MC has a slower post-dose defaecation response than PEG and is perceived as less cleansing; therefore, it is not currently used for major bowel cancer screening preparation. The standard formulation for bowel preparation is PEG; however, a large dose is required, and it has a distinctive flavour that is considered unpleasant. SP/MC requires a small dose and ensures fluid intake because it is administered in another beverage. Therefore, clinical trials have shown that SP/MC is superior to PEG in terms of acceptability. We aim to compare the novel bowel cleansing method (test group) comprising SP/MC with elobixibat hydrate and the standard bowel cleansing method comprising PEG plus ascorbic acid (standard group) for patients preparing for outpatient colonoscopy. METHODS: This phase III, multicentre, single-blind, noninferiority, randomised, controlled, trial has not yet been completed. Patients aged 40-69 years will be included as participants. Patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, constipation, inflammatory bowel disease, or severe organ dysfunction will be excluded. The target number of research participants is 540 (standard group, 270 cases; test group, 270 cases). The primary endpoint is the degree of bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [BBPS] score ≥ 6). The secondary endpoints are patient acceptability, adverse events, polyp/adenoma detection rate, number of polyps/adenomas detected, degree of bowel cleansing according to the BBPS (BBPS score ≥ 8), degree of bowel cleansing according to the Aronchik scale, and bowel cleansing time. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to develop a "patient-first" colon cleansing regimen without the risk of inadequate bowel preparation by using both elobixibat hydrate and SP/MC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; no. s041210067; 9 September 2021; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ), protocol version 1.5 (May 1, 2023).

Feasibility of endoscopic evaluation of Helicobacter pylori infection status by using the Kyoto classification of gastritis in the population-based gastric cancer screening program: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We have started a new population-based endoscopic gastric cancer screening program in Kurashiki city with consideration of Helicobacter pylori infection status based on endoscopic features. We aimed to verify the feasibility of this attempt in a prospective case-registration study (UMIN000028629). METHODS: Data were collected from 1784 subjects without past eradication of H. pylori and who underwent endoscopic gastric cancer screening in Kurashiki Central Hospital Preventive Healthcare Plaza from September 2017 to June 2018. Endoscopic judgment of H. pylori infection status was made according to the Kyoto classification of gastritis. For comparison, a combination serum test of anti-H. pylori antibody and pepsinogen I and II, the ABC method, was used. RESULTS: The endoscopic diagnoses were nongastritis, 1215 (68.1%); active or inactive gastritis, 469 (26.3%); and undefined, 23 (1.3%). With the ABC method as a reference standard, the false-negative rate of the endoscopic judgment for H. pylori infection was 16.3% (95% confidence interval: 13.1%-20.0%). Most false-negative cases were of Group B in the ABC method, which is considered gastritis with mild mucosal atrophy. Antibody titers in this population were mostly in the weak-positive range but clinically significant elevation of the antibody suggesting current infection was observed in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori infection status in a population-based gastric cancer screening program is mostly reliable, but false-negative results may occur, especially in patients with mild gastric atrophy. To avoid this limitation, we recommend adding H. pylori antibody test to the program.

AIMS65 predicts prognosis of patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding; a comparison with other risk-scoring systems.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Duodenal ulcer bleeding has a higher risk of mortality than bleeding from other portions of the gastrointestinal tract. AIMS65 is an effective risk-scoring system to predict prognosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and can be easily calculated without endoscopic findings. In this study, we investigate the usefulness of AIMS65 to predict prognosis of patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-five patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenal ulcer bleeding at Kurashiki Central hospital from July 2007 to June 2017 were studied. We compared AIMS65, Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS), admission Rockall, and full Rockall scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: In-hospital mortality due to duodenal ulcer bleeding occurred in 17 (6.7%). Scores of all scoring systems were significantly higher in patients with in-hospital mortality than in patients without it. AUROC values for predicting in-hospital mortality was 0.83 in AIMS65, 0.74 in GBS, 0.76 in admission Rockall score, and 0.82 in full Rockall score, a statistically insignificant difference among the systems. In AIMS65, score more than or equal to 2 was an optimal value to predict in-hospital mortality, with sensitivities of 88.2% and specificities of 59.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AIMS65 predicted in-hospital mortality of patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding as accurately as did other scoring systems. Given its simplicity of calculation, AIMS65 may be a more clinically practical system in the management of bleeding duodenal ulcer patients.

Efficacy and safety of cold forceps biopsy for diminutive pharyngeal neoplasms: Single-center, prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Management of diminutive pharyngeal neoplasms is controversial. Thus, we conducted a single-center, prospective pilot study to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic excision with cold forceps biopsy (CFB) of these lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine lesions endoscopically diagnosed with narrow-band imaging as pharyngeal neoplasms of 3 mm or smaller were excised with CFB using jumbo biopsy forceps (cap diameter 2.8 mm, jaw volume 12.4 mm3 ). The primary outcome was endoscopically determined local remnant/recurrence rate 3 months after CFB. The secondary outcomes were histopathologically determined local remnant/recurrence rate; risk factors associated with the endoscopic remnant/recurrence; and incidence of intraoperative or delayed bleeding and other adverse events. RESULTS: Histological diagnosis of the 39 CFB-excised lesions were: 11 high-grade dysplasia (28.2%), 22 low-grade dysplasia (56.4%), two basal cell hyperplasia (5.1%) and four atypical squamous epithelium (10.3%).Twenty-seven patients (30 lesions) underwent follow-up endoscopy 3 months after CFB; the endoscopic and pathological local remnant/recurrence rate was 20% (6/30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.7-36.6%) and 16.7% (5/30; 95% CI, 5.6-34.7%), respectively. Location of the lesion in the hypopharynx was a significant risk factor associated with the endoscopic local remnant/recurrence (P = 0.049). No significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Cold forceps biopsy with jumbo biopsy forceps appears to be a safe and effective technique for excising diminutive pharyngeal neoplasms. Although small, the excised lesions may have a remarkably high frequency of high-grade dysplasia. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000037980).

Effect of Vonoprazan on Delayed Bleeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasia among Antithrombotic Drug Users: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Prospective Observational Case Control Study.

Antithrombotic therapy is a major risk factor for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasia. A potassium-competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, is expected to prevent delayed bleeding better than conventional proton pomp inhibitors (PPIs), but the evidence is controversial. We sought to clarify the efficacy of vonoprazan for prevention of delayed bleeding after gastric ESD in patients under antithrombotic therapy. We prospectively registered 50 patients who underwent gastric ESD while receiving antithrombotic therapy and vonoprazan in our institution between October 2017 and September 2018. The incidence of delayed bleeding was compared with that in a historical control group of 116 patients treated with conventional PPI. We also evaluated risk factors associated with delayed bleeding. Delayed bleeding was observed in 8 of 50 patients (16.0%), which was not dissimilar from the incidence in the historical control group (12.1%) (p=0.49). In the univariate analysis, age (> 70 years) (p=0.034), multiple antithrombotic drug use (p<0.01), procedure time (> 200 min) (p=0.038) and tumor size (> 40 mm) (p<0.01) were associated with delayed bleeding after gastric ESD, but vonoprazan was not (p=0.49). Vonoprazan may not be more effective than conventional PPIs in preventing delayed bleeding after gastric ESD in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.

Impact of submucosal saline solution injection for cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) of small colorectal polyps is widely used. However, the technique is still troubled by insufficient resection depth, which may prevent precise pathologic evaluation. In this study, we investigated whether submucosal injection of saline solution helps to achieve deeper resection in CSP. METHODS: The study was a single-center, prospective, randomized trial. Patients with small (3- to 10-mm diameter) nonpedunculated adenomatous or sessile serrated colorectal polyps were randomly allocated to either conventional CSP (C-CSP) or CSP with submucosal injection (CSP-SI). Primary outcome was the rate of complete muscularis mucosae (MM) resection, defined by the proportion of MM under the tumor more than 80% of the tumor's horizontal dimension. Secondary outcomes were the rates of negative lateral and vertical margins, fragmentation of resected specimens, conversion to hot snare mucosal resection, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, and perforation. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to the CSP-SI (n = 107) or C-CSP (n = 107) group. The rate of complete MM resection was 43.9% in the CSP-SI group and 53.3% in the C-CSP group, a statistically insignificant difference. The rates of negative lateral margin and vertical margin (42.3% and 56.7%, respectively) in the CSP-SI group were significantly lower than those (58% and 76%) in the C-CSP group (P = .03 and P = .006, respectively). There was no polypectomy-related major bleeding or perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Saline solution injection into the submucosa did not improve the resection depth of CSP of small colorectal polyps, and the method resulted in lower rates of negative lateral and vertical margins of resected lesions. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000037980.).

Post-polypectomy bleeding in hot-snare polypectomy of colonic polyps under continued warfarin or short interruption of direct oral anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Newly published guidelines of the Japanese Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) suggest to consider endoscopic procedures with high risk of bleeding without stopping warfarin and with stopping direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) only on the day of the procedure. In this study, we aimed to test the validity of these recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 344 patients with anticoagulant therapy who underwent hot-snare polypectomy between January 2012 and October 2018. Patients (n = 132) with interruption of anticoagulants (3-7 days for warfarin and 2-3 days for DOACs before the procedure) and without heparin-bridging were excluded. Among the remaining 212 patients, the incidence of post-polypectomy bleeding was compared between the following 2 patient groups: patients who had interruption of anticoagulants with heparin-bridging (HB group, n = 139) and patients treated according to the new JGES guideline (FG group, n = 73). RESULTS: The rate of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) in FG group (9.6%) was not significantly different from that in HB group (12.9%, p = 0.5). In subgroup analysis, the incidence of bleeding in patients with warfarin (12.2%) and with DOAC (6.3%) in FG group was not significantly different from corresponding figures in HB group (14.2%, 0%). In multivariate analysis, number of resected polyps was associated with PPB, but the administration of anticoagulants according to the new guidelines was not a significant risk factor for PPB (p = .98). CONCLUSIONS: Our study affirms the recommendations of JGES for the management of anticoagulants in patients who undergo colonic polypectomy regarding post-polypectomy bleeding.

Factors Associated with possibly Inappropriate Histological Evaluation of Excised Specimens in Cold-snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small colorectal polyps may be removed with cold snare polypectomy (CSP). Some of these polyps may contain unexpectedly advanced neoplasia. Thus, it is important to establish criteria for excision that will ensure that the CSP specimens are adequate for accurate histological assessment. We retrospectively investigated depth of excised small polyps and their vertical margins in patients who underwent CSP. METHOD: CSP-excised specimens of 376 small colorectal polyps were examined. We histologically evaluated negative tumor vertical margins and complete resection through the muscularis mucosae, which was defined as muscularis mucosae present under the tumor along more than 80% of its horizontal axis. We also evaluated the fragmentation of the retrieved specimens. RESULTS: The mean size of the 376 polyps was 4.9 +/-1.4 mm, and 25 polyps (6.6%) had unexpectedly advanced histology. Thirty-two lesions (8.5%) were fragmented. In 275 (79.9%) of the remaining 344 unfragmented polyps, muscularis mucosae resection was judged complete. Vertical margins were confirmed negative in 99.6% (274/275) of polyps that had complete muscularis mucosae resection, but in only 33.3% (23/69) of polyps with incomplete resection. In 79 polyps (21%) (32 fragmented specimens and 47 unfragmented specimens), including 5 polyps with advanced histology, negative vertical margins could not be confirmed. Sessile morphology and location in the cecum were independent risk factors for incomplete muscularis mucosae resection and fragmentation. CONCLUSION: Incomplete muscularis mucosae resection and fragmentation at retrieval are risk factors for inadequate histological evaluation of CSP-excised small colorectal polyps, especially for sessile polyps and polyps in the cecum.

Safety of cold polypectomy for small colorectal neoplastic lesions: a prospective cohort study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Cold polypectomy has been widely accepted for removal of small colorectal polyps. However, no large-scale prospective study exists as for its safety in Japan. We investigated this issue in this single-center, prospective cohort study in a total of 1198 colorectal polyps resected with cold polypectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent cold polypectomy for colorectal neoplastic lesions less than 10-mm diameter between September 2014 and October 2016 were enrolled. Primary outcome was the incidence of delayed bleeding within 2 weeks after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the rate of immediate bleeding, perforation, endoscopic en bloc resection, and advanced histology. RESULTS: Cold polypectomy was performed on 1198 polyps in the 474 patients. No delayed bleeding or colonic perforation was observed. Immediate bleeding during the procedure, requiring endoscopic hemostasis, occurred in 97 lesions (8.1%), and all of them were successfully managed endoscopically. The endoscopic en bloc resection rate was 97.2%. Twenty-eight lesions (2.3%) were histologically diagnosed as advanced neoplasia; among them, three lesions were well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, and in two of them, a negative margin was not histologically confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Cold polypectomy for small colorectal polyps is a safe technique without significant complication, but careful endoscopic diagnosis at cold polypectomy is necessary to identify advanced neoplasia. The reliability of cold polypectomy in excision of polyps with high-grade neoplasia should be established before the procedure becomes standard in the excision of small colorectal polyps. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000014812.